Skip to main content

Erroneous Refunds to Medicare Part D beneficiaries must be repaid.

A Federal Appeals Court has ruled that the Medicare Part D beneficiaries who were erroneously mailed a premium refund do not have the right to apply for a waiver excusing them from repaying it. This new decision overturns a prior ruling by a federal district court ordering the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to halt efforts to collect the mistaken refunds.
In August 2006, about 230,000 people were mailed refunds for their Medicare prescription drug benefit premiums and told to pay their carrier directly. Although this was not correct, no one ever admitted how the mistake was made. Almost immediately, the government insisted that the money (about $215 per beneficiary) be paid back by the end of September. The Center for Medicare Advocacy filed suit on behalf of two senior’s rights groups, arguing that Medicare law states that the government cannot recover an overpayment if the beneficiary was not at fault and if such recovery would violate “equity and good conscience.”
Last September, the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., agreed and issued an injunction ordering CMS to send a notice to the beneficiaries stating that each has a right under federal law to request a waiver of the obligation to repay the funds. CMS appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which recently overruled the District Court. While calling the government's mistake “a monumental gaffe,” the Appeals Court ruled that the right to ask CMS to waive the repayment of an incorrect payment applies only to a “provider of services” for “items or services furnished an individual,” and, “it has nothing to do with erroneous refunds of Medicare premiums.” If you received such a refund, and have yet to pay it back, it appears you will now have to do so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., Leading Elder Law Attorney, Dies at 74

Clifton B. Kruse , Jr., a revered elder law attorney who was admired as much for his kindness and generosity to fellow practitioners as for his grasp of the law, died December 30, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He was 74. The cause was complications from Alzheimer's disease. For many in the field, Kruse set the standard for all that an elder law attorney can and should be. One of elder law's founding fathers, he combined a gentlemanly charm, warmth and caring with one of the sharpest and most ethical of legal minds. Wrote Arizona elder law attorney Robert Fleming in a tribute , "In my third of a century of elder law practice I have never met another lawyer who managed to pull together sophistication, heartfelt empathy, intellectual rigor and courtly manner in the same fashion Clifton Kruse projected. He did it, to all appearances, effortlessly. He was a friend and mentor to many in the elder law community (I count myself among those legions)." Kruse was the e...

Knee Surgery OK for Octogenarians

Knee replacement surgery can improve the quality of life even for very elderly patients, according to a study presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) . The study found that patients in their 80s can benefit both physically and socially from knee replacement surgery, also called total knee arthroplasty (TKA), once thought too risky for the very elderly. “As patients are living longer, there is an upward trend in the demand for quality of life among the elderly population,” said Edsel Arandia, M.D., lead author of the study and an orthopaedic surgeon at Philippine Orthopaedic Center and a Fellow at Singapore General Hospital. “As patients age, debilitating diseases like arthritis of the knee begin to develop. We conducted this study to determine the viability of TKA in octogenarians and to learn whether their quality of life improves after TKA.” Dr. Arandia and his team reviewed data from 128 patients older than 80 years of age wh...

Harry's Law gets Medicaid Planning All Wrong

I usually enjoy David Kelley's crazy law-related television shows like Boston Legal and Harry's Law. They are great fun and often give some good portrayals of lawyers and legal issues. But, I'm always laughing at how a client comes in to the office in the morning and somehow they are in Court in the afternoon - sometimes with a jury there. It takes years to get into Court most of the time and at least several days to get a jury together and ready for a trial. But, I'll allow some literary license to TV to keep the story moving. But, I don't like it when they get the law completely wrong and especially when they have the lawyers participate in fraud. Last week's episode of Harry's Law got the Medicaid rules wrong, and put lawyers in a bad light. Let me explain. First, Kelley got Medicaid law all wrong. The couple in question only had a house and the husband needed nursing home care. The wife said she needed to get a divorce to save the house. This is wron...