Skip to main content

Don't Mess with the IRS

My mail box is filled with tax reporting documents at this time of year. All of my banks, brokers and employers are sending the IRS information on what I earned last year. I’ll have to file a return and report them all, or be subject to criminal and civil sanctions. Is there any way out of this? Some people think so, and have come up with many novel arguments why they don’t have to pay the tax. But, I’m not going to try any of them, and you shouldn’t either. The IRS recently issued a detailed report on the major “Frivolous Tax Arguments” and why they don’t work. You can read the entire 70-page report on the IRS website if you like, but I have summarized a few key sections in this article.
Argument 1.: The Tax System is “Voluntary” so you don’t have to file a return. The tax system is “voluntary” in that it is controlled in the first instance by the taxpayer. We get to “voluntarily” report our income, calculate the appropriate tax, and then pay it. The system does not do it for us, we must file our own 1040 (or other) tax return form, and calculate our own tax bill (subject to audit and revision by the IRS).
The requirement that you file and pay is not really voluntary. Federal law (the Tax Code) Title 26 United States Code, in sections 6011(a) and 6012(a) state that a taxpayer who has received above a certain amount of income is required to file a return and to pay the required tax. Failure to file may subject the individual to fines, imprisonment and civil penalties. The rules start with voluntarily compliance, but the Treasury department has the power to enforce the laws through collection efforts and the Courts.
Argument 2.: Payment of the tax is “Voluntary.” Some say that because payment is voluntary, you don’t have to pay. This is based on a similar misreading of the Tax Code as above. Adherents to this argument won’t pay until the IRS can prove to their satisfaction that they must, but will not listen when the IRS cites the Code. Sections 1 and 6151 of the Tax Code clearly state that you must pay taxes. Despite clear proof, some will never believe what the IRS says (not even when they are dragged out of their homes and hauled off to jail.)
Argument 3.: Wages are not “income” subject to the tax. Some contend that wages are not “income.” This argument sounds pretty plausible. No one just gives you your wages, you exchange your time and effort in order to get them. Like any business, this is your investment and so deductible against your income. If you value your time at exactly what you get paid, then you didn’t make a profit, and so have no income.
Unfortunately, this argument fails too. The Tax Code defines income as all income from whatever source, and includes compensation for services. (Section 61). Any income from whatever source is presumed to be income unless the taxpayer can prove that it is exempt or excluded under some other section of the Tax Code. All wages are “income” subject to the income-tax.
The IRS absolutely hates these frivolous arguments. If you try to use one of them, you risk the full wrath of “the Service.” They seem to enjoy prosecuting these matters and holding up the offenders as examples to others. You may recall the couple in New Hampshire who were recently taken to jail for tax evasion. You may even know that Al Capone, the famous mobster, was convicted, not of murder or any other crime, but tax evasion. Don’t mess with the IRS!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., Leading Elder Law Attorney, Dies at 74

Clifton B. Kruse , Jr., a revered elder law attorney who was admired as much for his kindness and generosity to fellow practitioners as for his grasp of the law, died December 30, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He was 74. The cause was complications from Alzheimer's disease. For many in the field, Kruse set the standard for all that an elder law attorney can and should be. One of elder law's founding fathers, he combined a gentlemanly charm, warmth and caring with one of the sharpest and most ethical of legal minds. Wrote Arizona elder law attorney Robert Fleming in a tribute , "In my third of a century of elder law practice I have never met another lawyer who managed to pull together sophistication, heartfelt empathy, intellectual rigor and courtly manner in the same fashion Clifton Kruse projected. He did it, to all appearances, effortlessly. He was a friend and mentor to many in the elder law community (I count myself among those legions)." Kruse was the e...

Knee Surgery OK for Octogenarians

Knee replacement surgery can improve the quality of life even for very elderly patients, according to a study presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) . The study found that patients in their 80s can benefit both physically and socially from knee replacement surgery, also called total knee arthroplasty (TKA), once thought too risky for the very elderly. “As patients are living longer, there is an upward trend in the demand for quality of life among the elderly population,” said Edsel Arandia, M.D., lead author of the study and an orthopaedic surgeon at Philippine Orthopaedic Center and a Fellow at Singapore General Hospital. “As patients age, debilitating diseases like arthritis of the knee begin to develop. We conducted this study to determine the viability of TKA in octogenarians and to learn whether their quality of life improves after TKA.” Dr. Arandia and his team reviewed data from 128 patients older than 80 years of age wh...

Harry's Law gets Medicaid Planning All Wrong

I usually enjoy David Kelley's crazy law-related television shows like Boston Legal and Harry's Law. They are great fun and often give some good portrayals of lawyers and legal issues. But, I'm always laughing at how a client comes in to the office in the morning and somehow they are in Court in the afternoon - sometimes with a jury there. It takes years to get into Court most of the time and at least several days to get a jury together and ready for a trial. But, I'll allow some literary license to TV to keep the story moving. But, I don't like it when they get the law completely wrong and especially when they have the lawyers participate in fraud. Last week's episode of Harry's Law got the Medicaid rules wrong, and put lawyers in a bad light. Let me explain. First, Kelley got Medicaid law all wrong. The couple in question only had a house and the husband needed nursing home care. The wife said she needed to get a divorce to save the house. This is wron...