Skip to main content

IRA Beneficiary Designations

One part of Estate Planning that I cannot control is the beneficiary designations on your Life Insurance and Retirement Accounts (IRA, 401k, etc). No matter what I write in your Will or Trust, it cannot change who gets those retirement accounts. This is accomplished with a Beneficiary Designation form held by the account custodian. You should have filled one out when you opened the account, and you can do a new one any time to update it.

The trouble is that you can mess things up if you don’t enter the right beneficiaries or if you don’t coordinate your beneficiary designations with your other estate planning documents (your Will or Trust). Worse, you can do what you know is right and the account custodian (the bank or financial company holding the account) can mess it up for you.

One of the main problems that people encounter is poorly crafted beneficiary designation forms. You need to name a Primary Beneficiary for your accounts, and you also need to name a Contingent or Alternate Beneficiary, in case your primary beneficiary dies before you do. If you have time, you can update your form after a named beneficiary dies, but you might not have time. So, the Contingent Beneficiary is very important. But, what if the primary and contingent beneficiary both die before you? What happens then?

This is where most custodians and their poorly written forms will fail you. You should be able to use a legal designation like “my issue” and “per stirpes” or “by right of representation”, but those terms aren’t always on the forms. You can ask for help, but the representatives of those companies don’t always know the right thing to do.

What you want to do, usually, is name your spouse as primary beneficiary, and name your children (in equal shares) as contingent beneficiaries, and your grandchildren as second contingent beneficiaries. You should use language like, “to my children or other issue, per stirpes.” This legal language means that each living child would get an equal share, while the children of a deceased child (your grandchildren) would share (equally between them) in their parent’s share. If a child died without children, the shares would be divided equally among the surviving children.

The worst thing you can do (for income-tax purposes at least) is to fail to have a living beneficiary or to name your estate as beneficiary. Your family will lose the ability to spread out the required withdrawals over an individual life expectancy. More tax is usually paid when this happens. So, you should review all of your beneficiary designations right now. File new forms for any that are wrong or doubtful. If the form doesn’t have a check box for children and “issue” or for a “per stirpes” distribution, then you need to write in those words yourself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., Leading Elder Law Attorney, Dies at 74

Clifton B. Kruse , Jr., a revered elder law attorney who was admired as much for his kindness and generosity to fellow practitioners as for his grasp of the law, died December 30, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He was 74. The cause was complications from Alzheimer's disease. For many in the field, Kruse set the standard for all that an elder law attorney can and should be. One of elder law's founding fathers, he combined a gentlemanly charm, warmth and caring with one of the sharpest and most ethical of legal minds. Wrote Arizona elder law attorney Robert Fleming in a tribute , "In my third of a century of elder law practice I have never met another lawyer who managed to pull together sophistication, heartfelt empathy, intellectual rigor and courtly manner in the same fashion Clifton Kruse projected. He did it, to all appearances, effortlessly. He was a friend and mentor to many in the elder law community (I count myself among those legions)." Kruse was the e...

Knee Surgery OK for Octogenarians

Knee replacement surgery can improve the quality of life even for very elderly patients, according to a study presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) . The study found that patients in their 80s can benefit both physically and socially from knee replacement surgery, also called total knee arthroplasty (TKA), once thought too risky for the very elderly. “As patients are living longer, there is an upward trend in the demand for quality of life among the elderly population,” said Edsel Arandia, M.D., lead author of the study and an orthopaedic surgeon at Philippine Orthopaedic Center and a Fellow at Singapore General Hospital. “As patients age, debilitating diseases like arthritis of the knee begin to develop. We conducted this study to determine the viability of TKA in octogenarians and to learn whether their quality of life improves after TKA.” Dr. Arandia and his team reviewed data from 128 patients older than 80 years of age wh...

Harry's Law gets Medicaid Planning All Wrong

I usually enjoy David Kelley's crazy law-related television shows like Boston Legal and Harry's Law. They are great fun and often give some good portrayals of lawyers and legal issues. But, I'm always laughing at how a client comes in to the office in the morning and somehow they are in Court in the afternoon - sometimes with a jury there. It takes years to get into Court most of the time and at least several days to get a jury together and ready for a trial. But, I'll allow some literary license to TV to keep the story moving. But, I don't like it when they get the law completely wrong and especially when they have the lawyers participate in fraud. Last week's episode of Harry's Law got the Medicaid rules wrong, and put lawyers in a bad light. Let me explain. First, Kelley got Medicaid law all wrong. The couple in question only had a house and the husband needed nursing home care. The wife said she needed to get a divorce to save the house. This is wron...