Skip to main content

Social Security "Do Over" loophole closed

The Social Security Administration has eliminated a loophole that had allowed Social Security recipients to start receiving benefits when they first became eligible but then gave them a chance to re-do their benefits at a higher level later on.

Anyone can collect Social Security benefits starting at age 62, but if you elect to get early benefits, your monthly check will be much lower than if you wait until full retirement age. Many people elect early benefits, but then realize it was a mistake. Because of a rule allowing you to change your mind, many people were electing early benefits as a planning technique.

A provision of Social Security law had allowed beneficiaries to apply for early benefits but at a later age they could withdraw their application, reapply and receive full retirement benefits. All they had to do was pay back all of the benefits they had received. Since there was no interest added to this, it gave those who could afford to do the pay-back a second look at their choice, at no additional cost. Of course, this really only benefited those wealthy enough to afford the pay-back. Those who spent their monthly checks were stuck with the lower amount and could not afford the "do-over."

Under the new rules, retirees may still withdraw their Social Security applications, but only once and only within 12 months of first receiving benefits. You can still change your mind if you file for early benefits, but only if you change your mind quick enough. And, you still have to pay back those early benefits. And, you can only do it once. So, this planning strategy is no longer available for those who could afford to take the chance for several years and make a possibly large pay-back in order to get higher monthly benefits.

Here is the SSA news-release on the change: http://www.ssa.gov/pressoffice/pr/withdrawal-policy-pr.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., Leading Elder Law Attorney, Dies at 74

Clifton B. Kruse , Jr., a revered elder law attorney who was admired as much for his kindness and generosity to fellow practitioners as for his grasp of the law, died December 30, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He was 74. The cause was complications from Alzheimer's disease. For many in the field, Kruse set the standard for all that an elder law attorney can and should be. One of elder law's founding fathers, he combined a gentlemanly charm, warmth and caring with one of the sharpest and most ethical of legal minds. Wrote Arizona elder law attorney Robert Fleming in a tribute , "In my third of a century of elder law practice I have never met another lawyer who managed to pull together sophistication, heartfelt empathy, intellectual rigor and courtly manner in the same fashion Clifton Kruse projected. He did it, to all appearances, effortlessly. He was a friend and mentor to many in the elder law community (I count myself among those legions)." Kruse was the e...

Knee Surgery OK for Octogenarians

Knee replacement surgery can improve the quality of life even for very elderly patients, according to a study presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) . The study found that patients in their 80s can benefit both physically and socially from knee replacement surgery, also called total knee arthroplasty (TKA), once thought too risky for the very elderly. “As patients are living longer, there is an upward trend in the demand for quality of life among the elderly population,” said Edsel Arandia, M.D., lead author of the study and an orthopaedic surgeon at Philippine Orthopaedic Center and a Fellow at Singapore General Hospital. “As patients age, debilitating diseases like arthritis of the knee begin to develop. We conducted this study to determine the viability of TKA in octogenarians and to learn whether their quality of life improves after TKA.” Dr. Arandia and his team reviewed data from 128 patients older than 80 years of age wh...

Harry's Law gets Medicaid Planning All Wrong

I usually enjoy David Kelley's crazy law-related television shows like Boston Legal and Harry's Law. They are great fun and often give some good portrayals of lawyers and legal issues. But, I'm always laughing at how a client comes in to the office in the morning and somehow they are in Court in the afternoon - sometimes with a jury there. It takes years to get into Court most of the time and at least several days to get a jury together and ready for a trial. But, I'll allow some literary license to TV to keep the story moving. But, I don't like it when they get the law completely wrong and especially when they have the lawyers participate in fraud. Last week's episode of Harry's Law got the Medicaid rules wrong, and put lawyers in a bad light. Let me explain. First, Kelley got Medicaid law all wrong. The couple in question only had a house and the husband needed nursing home care. The wife said she needed to get a divorce to save the house. This is wron...