Skip to main content

Divorce, Marriage and Estate Planning

Many clients ask what they should do about their estate planning after a divorce. In general, a Divorce extinguishes any rights that the ex-spouse had in the estate of the other. A Will clause that leaves assets to “my wife, Jane Smith” will be voided by a divorce, the gift will fail, and it become part of the “residue” of the estate. If the ex-spouse is named as the beneficiary of the residue, then that gift will fail as well, and the Court will use the intestate distribution rules to give the residue to the children or other heirs-at-law.

However, it is wise to change all estate planning documents to avoid any questions or ambiguity. It is especially important to review and update beneficiary designations for life insurance and other assets such as Individual Retirement Accounts.

The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled on the issue of an IRA and an ex-wife as the named beneficiary. In The Estate of Robert Tremaine v. Lorraine Tremaine, the Court ruled that the ex-wife of the decedent should keep the proceeds of his IRA where she was still named as beneficiary at his death. This ruling came despite an agreement in their divorce that each was to keep his own retirement funds and accounts and the other gave up all rights and interests in them.

The Court found that the agreement was ambiguous as to the death benefit. It was clear that Mr. Tremaine had the right to withdraw the funds during his life, and the right to change the beneficiary, but he failed to exercise that right. The agreement to give up rights to the IRA did not necessarily include giving up the position as beneficiary if the ex-spouse did not make any changes.

This shows that it is very important to review all assets and complete new beneficiary designation forms so that your assets will pass as you want. You should not rely on outside agreements or court decrees to make those changes.

Another issue that bears further discussion is the effect of getting married on Estate and Benefits planning. A spouse has certain rights in marital assets including a general claim against the estate of a deceased spouse, even if not named in the Will. New estate planning documents should be completed if you get married.

For Medicaid purposes, all of the assets of the couple are counted in making a determination of eligibility for benefits, regardless of the origin of the assets. Pre-nuptial agreements cannot change this rule no matter what they say, because the Federal law of Medicaid and public policy overrule the agreement. This means that a well-off person who marries a less-well-off person will be responsible for the spouse’s cost of nursing home care, no matter what.

Estate Planning should not overrule love, but the consequences of marriage and divorce must be taken into account when making your Estate Plan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clifton B. Kruse, Jr., Leading Elder Law Attorney, Dies at 74

Clifton B. Kruse , Jr., a revered elder law attorney who was admired as much for his kindness and generosity to fellow practitioners as for his grasp of the law, died December 30, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He was 74. The cause was complications from Alzheimer's disease. For many in the field, Kruse set the standard for all that an elder law attorney can and should be. One of elder law's founding fathers, he combined a gentlemanly charm, warmth and caring with one of the sharpest and most ethical of legal minds. Wrote Arizona elder law attorney Robert Fleming in a tribute , "In my third of a century of elder law practice I have never met another lawyer who managed to pull together sophistication, heartfelt empathy, intellectual rigor and courtly manner in the same fashion Clifton Kruse projected. He did it, to all appearances, effortlessly. He was a friend and mentor to many in the elder law community (I count myself among those legions)." Kruse was the e...

Knee Surgery OK for Octogenarians

Knee replacement surgery can improve the quality of life even for very elderly patients, according to a study presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) . The study found that patients in their 80s can benefit both physically and socially from knee replacement surgery, also called total knee arthroplasty (TKA), once thought too risky for the very elderly. “As patients are living longer, there is an upward trend in the demand for quality of life among the elderly population,” said Edsel Arandia, M.D., lead author of the study and an orthopaedic surgeon at Philippine Orthopaedic Center and a Fellow at Singapore General Hospital. “As patients age, debilitating diseases like arthritis of the knee begin to develop. We conducted this study to determine the viability of TKA in octogenarians and to learn whether their quality of life improves after TKA.” Dr. Arandia and his team reviewed data from 128 patients older than 80 years of age wh...

Harry's Law gets Medicaid Planning All Wrong

I usually enjoy David Kelley's crazy law-related television shows like Boston Legal and Harry's Law. They are great fun and often give some good portrayals of lawyers and legal issues. But, I'm always laughing at how a client comes in to the office in the morning and somehow they are in Court in the afternoon - sometimes with a jury there. It takes years to get into Court most of the time and at least several days to get a jury together and ready for a trial. But, I'll allow some literary license to TV to keep the story moving. But, I don't like it when they get the law completely wrong and especially when they have the lawyers participate in fraud. Last week's episode of Harry's Law got the Medicaid rules wrong, and put lawyers in a bad light. Let me explain. First, Kelley got Medicaid law all wrong. The couple in question only had a house and the husband needed nursing home care. The wife said she needed to get a divorce to save the house. This is wron...